We need some new words; new defining words.
But we're creating them daily, probably hourly, I can hear you thinking. And that's fair enough. Just how recently did I adopt, or adapt to, words like server and processor, not to mention bits and bytes and firewalls and apps. But those are all techie terms. I'm talking about sociological terminology which seems to be mired in the mud of decades.
I find it very strange, for instance, that in the English language there is no word for a parent who has lost a child. We dignify the situation of one who has lost both parents with the noun orphan. You lose your spouse, you're a widow or widower.
But surely the loss of a child is one of the worst things that can happen to a person, and yet our language offers no linguistic easy way out. A wife who has lost her husband can simply say, I'm a widow, and leave it at that if she wants. But a parent must stumble through some agonizing sentence, even if one as clipped as, I lost my only son.
The author Karla Holloway, in an essay on NPR back in 2006, addressed this topic.* She expressed it as needing to 'name the pain' in order to assist in healing. I saw what the loss of two children, before I was born, did to my parents in the long-term. I wonder, had there been a single word to express what had happened to them, if they might have found a way to tell me, instead of leaving it to my aunt eventually to clarify for me the presence of that huge elephant never absent from our home.
There is considerable on-line chat (surprise, surprise!) on this topic, and from it I discovered that few languages have such a word. The exceptions are, apparently, the semitic languages. German has an expression I find very touching, it translates literally as 'orphaned parent' but still it is not incorporated into a single word. Why is a single word that sums up this horrific situation so rare?
A few ideas are offered on line. Some suggest that it is only recently that infant mortality has dropped sufficiently to make it an unusual situation for a child to pre-decease his/her parents. That does offer a certain uncomfortable logic I suppose, but I don't see how it translates into the absence of a word. Someone else offered the explanation that, with it having been such a common situation until recent times, and still being sadly frequent in much of the world, having a word for it would be redundant, like, this person, obviously a MAN, says 'having a word for a man with a penis.' The insensitivity of this analogy angers me, but then if I am going to be so precious I need to stay away from posts on the internet.
Another, herself a bereaved mother, suggests that it is something too terrible to be put into words. I sympathize with the idea, but we have words for so many still worse things, just take infanticide and genocide for instance, that I can't go along with that explanation either.
Others believe the absence of the word is due to the broader social insignificance of the event. Becoming an orphan, widow, or widower, changes a person's status in society, whereas losing a child does not. I find that incredibly hard and cold, and don't want to believe it. Are we, the majority of the world's population, so calculating that we only see sorrowful events which change people's lives in the light of how they might affect us? Now we might have to support that child, give that widow a pension, or marry that widower. But we are not affected by the death of a friend's child so consider it unimportant? Even at my most cynical, I truly don't believe that most of us are so uncaring; so unaffected by the sorrows of our friends and neighbors, or even complete strangers.
So I remain simply baffled by the lack of this, what I consider very important, word. Someone on line suggests adopting the word 'shadow' because anyone who has lost a child becomes a shadow of his or her former self. Personally, I like it. It certainly describes my own parents. I have so often wished there were some way that I could know what they were like before they lost two children. But I can only extrapolate from the parents I knew, and from old photographs in which they looked so much happier than I ever saw them in my lifetime.
But I don't expect this or any other word to appear in general use any time soon. Only technology will continue to toss new words at us faster than we can grasp them, and I shall go on struggling with Dvi/Hdmi adapters and why my Thunderbolt port doesn't work and does it matter? Or maybe I have a vga port and does that matter?
And are these all defining words? Only my computer knows for sure.
* http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5511147
A postscript from Gillian -
After I read this to our group, Ray S. suggested using a new adjective rather than a noun.
Just as we say 'childless' of a person or couple without children, we could say 'childloss' of those who have suffered that terrible bereavment.
Thank you, Ray, I find that moving and beautiful in it's simplicity.
© February 2016
About the Author
No comments:
Post a Comment